Introduction
Vocabulary teaching is at the heart of every language classroom, yet most schools still teach words as items to memorise rather than meanings carried through communication. In 2023, Stuart Webb published a rigorous meta-analysis that, in my opinion, deserves every language teacher’s attention as it provides strong evidence that vocabulary is acquired most effectively through meaningful exposure – not memorised word lists or single-word drills. And the implications for modern language teaching are profound!
What Is Incidental Vocabulary Learning?
Incidental vocabulary learning refers to acquiring new words as a by-product of understanding messages. Learners are not studying words directly; instead, they encounter them naturally while reading, listening, watching, or having conversations. In this process:
Words are not learned as labels (e.g. dog = perro = chien).
Words are learned as components of meaning (e.g. je promène mon chien, sacar al perro, I walk my dog).
In other words, vocabulary grows not because students memorise lists, but because they track meaning in context repeatedly over time thereby reinforcing each lexical-item memory trace in long-term memory, building new associations with other lexis and contexts and deepening word knowledge. The learner’s brain forms a memory link between:
- sound
- written form
- position in a phrase
- real meaning in context
- emotional/cultural associations
Incidental learning builds usable language instead of mere translatable labels.
What Webb (2023) Found: The Evidence
Webb’s (2023) meta-analysis examined a large collection of studies looking at vocabulary learning through reading, listening, dual reading–listening, and viewing (e.g. video with captions). Here are the core findings, which in my view, every teacher should be aware of:
1) Incidental learning is real, measurable, and substantial
Learners gain vocabulary automatically through meaningful input—provided they encounter words repeatedly.
2) Listening + reading together beats listening or reading alone
The strongest learning happens when input is dual-modality: e.g. reading along with audio
3) Viewing + captions supports the best recognition gains
Captions help learners match sounds and forms, especially for high-frequency vocabulary.
4) Repetition of the same vocabulary matters more than text difficulty
Learners need many encounters with words. Repeating texts is more valuable than simplifying content
5) Incidental learning is strengthened by post-input tasks
Explicit follow-up boosts retention dramatically (e.g. dictation, retellings, shadowing).
Implications for the Language Classroom
What teachers should avoid
Webb’s findings undermine several common practices:
| Traditional Practice | Why It Fails |
|---|---|
| Single-word lists | No meaning, no memory trace |
| “One text per week, new topic each time” | Not enough repeated encounters |
| Teaching listening without transcripts | Cannot see word forms → no retention |
| Simplifying texts to avoid “difficult words” | Eliminates repetition of valuable language |
Vocabulary does not grow through exposure to many different texts.
Vocabulary grows through recycling meaningful language in a few carefully chosen texts.
What Teachers Should Do Instead
| Principle from Webb | Classroom Response |
|---|---|
| Dual-modality input works best | Always pair listening + text (transcript, subtitles) |
| Repetition builds memory | Use the same resource 3–5 times with varied tasks |
| Input + follow-up = optimal | Always do a deep-processing task after listening/reading |
| Captions support mapping | Use subtitles intentionally, not casually |
| Tasks should focus on meaning | Don’t ask students to hunt for words, but for ideas |
Practical Classroom Tasks Aligned with Webb (2023)
Below are tried and tested research-driven activities that turn incidental exposure into lasting acquisition.1) Shadow-Read
Students read and speak along with the audio of a text (story, dialogue).
Why it works: Links sound + meaning + printed form, strengthening long-term memory.
2) Micro-Retell with Constraints
Students retell a short text using only key phrases (e.g. je voudrais…, me gusta…, era muy…).
Why it works: Forces retrieval of chunks with meaning, not isolated words.
3) Partial Dictogloss
Students listen and reconstruct parts of the text using memory + collaboration.
Why it works: Builds deep processing + syntactic awareness without grammar lectures.
4) Captioned Video + Chunk Hunt
Learners watch a clip twice, first for meaning, then highlight repeated phrases.
Why it works: Focuses on high-frequency building blocks, not single words.
5) Repeated Text Cycle
Use the same text across 3–4 lessons with different activities:
| Day | Activity |
|---|---|
| 1 | Predict → Listen + Read for gist |
| 2 | Shadow-Read + Chunk Identification |
| 3 | Dictogloss + Micro-Retell |
| 4 | Fluency Role-Play using the chunks |
Why it works: Provides multiple encounters, transforming incidental learning into stable, usable vocabulary.
How Webb’s research Supports the EPI Approach
Webb’s conclusions sit squarely behind the EPI methodology. Extensive Processing Instruction insists that students need deep recycling of comprehensible input, not single-exposure topic teaching. Webb shows that vocabulary only sticks when:
- it is encountered many times in meaningful input
- listening + reading occur together
- follow-up tasks reprocess chunks, not words
- repetition happens across lessons, not within a single session
This is exactly the design principle behind sentence builders, narrow listening, narrow reading, and multimodal phonology work in EPI. The model does not “teach vocabulary”; it engineers repeated encounters with communicative chunks. EPI, therefore, is not simply a teaching style: it is a curriculum response to what Webb’s data demonstrate. It prioritises recycling, retrieval, multimodal exposure, and deep processing, which are the precise conditions Webb identifies as drivers of durable vocabulary acquisition.
Conclusion: From Word Lists to Meaning-Driven Input
Webb’s (2023) research proves that vocabulary thrives when language is encountered repeatedly in meaningful contexts, not memorised as isolated items. The future of MFL teaching is not in bigger word lists, but in smarter recycling, deeper processing, and multimodal exposure.
Don’t teach words. Teach experiences containing words.
The Language Gym 